Skip to main content
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Download PDF
  • Original Article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Predictive factors for progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 1-year study

Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation volume 42, pages 111–119 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Background and objective

The cause of scoliosis remains unknown in 80–85% of adolescent patients. Treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains a complex challenge.

Aim

The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of different factors [age, initial Risser’s score and initial Cobb’s angle, surface electromyography (SEMG), activity of both paraspinal muscles at the apex of the curve] in the progression of AIS.

Patients and methods

This study included 30 patients with AIS. Full history taking and spinal and neurological examinations were carried out. Initial Cobb’s angle and Risser’s staging were determined, together with SEMG of paraspinal muscles at the curve’s apex. Reassessment of Cobb’s angle and Risser’s score was done 1 year later.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of data was carried out with an IBM computer using statistical program for social science (version 18) software and services. Quantitative data were presented as mean, SD, minimum and maximum values, and range. Qualitative data were presented as number and percentage, analyzed with the χ2-test. Analytic statistics were calculated using Student’s t-test to compare two independent means. A receiver-operating character curve was constructed using Medcalc program 3.5.

Results

Twenty-six girls and four boys with dorsal and dorsolumbar scoliosis were included in this study. There was significant increase in Cobb’s angle and Risser’s score. Age, Risser’s score, and SEMG results on the convex side were significantly correlated with progression of the curve. Cobb’s angle was the most sensitive predictor, followed by SEMG, whereas age, initial Risser’s score, and SEMG had the highest specificity as predictors.

Conclusion

Cobb’s angle, Risser’s score, and SEMG are specific, sensitive, and positive predictors for progression of AIS.

References

  1. Busscher I, Wapstra FH, Veldhuizen AG. Predicting growth and curve progression in the individual patient with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: design of a prospective longitudinal cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yrjönen T, Ylikoski M. Effect of growth velocity on the progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in boys. J Pediatr Orthop B 2006; 15:311–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Little DG, Sussman MD. The Risser sign: a critical analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 1994; 14:569–575.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Izumi Y. The accuracy of Risser staging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995; 20:1868–1871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanders JO, Browne RH, Cooney TE, Finegold DN, McConnell SJ, Margraf SA. Correlates of the peak height velocity in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006; 31:2289–2295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanders JO. Maturity indicators in spinal deformity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(Suppl 1):14–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nault ML, Parent S, Phan P, Roy-Beaudry M, Labelle H, Rivard M. A modified Risser grading system predicts the curve acceleration phase of female adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92:1073–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Staudenmann D, Roeleveld K, Stegeman DF, van Dieën JH. Methodological aspects of SEMG recordings for force estimation — a tutorial and review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2010; 20:375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheung J, Veldhuizen AG, Halbertsma JP, Maurits NM, Sluiter WJ, Cool JC, Van Horn JR. The relation between electromyography and growth velocity of the spine in the evaluation of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:1011–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawes MC, O’brien JP. The transformation of spinal curvature into spinal deformity: pathological processes and implications for treatment. Scoliosis 2006; 1:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stokes IA, Burwell RG, Dangerfield PH, IBSE. Biomechanical spinal growth modulation and progressive adolescent scoliosis — a test of the ‘vicious cycle’ pathogenetic hypothesis: summary of an electronic focus group debate of the IBSE. Scoliosis 2006; 1:16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Candotti B, Pasni M, Melo M, La Torre M. Assessment of neuromuscular activation in individuals with scoliosis using surface electromyography. Rev Bras Fisioter 2008; 12:13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lenke LG. Lenke classification system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: treatment recommendations. Instr Course Lect 2005; 54:537–542.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Beauchamp M, Labelle H, Grimard G, Stanciu C, Poitras B, Dansereau J. Diurnal variation of Cobb angle measurement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993; 18:1581–1583.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cheung J, Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG, Klein JP, Verdonck B, Nijlunsing R, et al. The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine. Eur Spine J 2002; 11:535–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Korovessis PG, Stamatakis MV. Prediction of scoliotic Cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996; 21:1661–1666.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noordeen MH, Haddad FS, Edgar MA, Pringle J. Spinal growth and a histologic evaluation of the Risser grade in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999; 24:535–538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel K. Quatd in corrective exercise (chapter 11). H Aarnold, editor. Amazon. 5th ed. UK: Corrective Exercise: A practical Approach; 2009. P130–P166.

  19. Kisner C. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and technique (chapter 16). 4th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2002. P638–P677.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dimeglio A, Canavese F. The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 2012; 21:64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. DiMeglio A, Canavese F, Charles YP. Growth and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: when and how much? J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31(Suppl):S28–S36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Canavese F, Dimeglio A. Normal and abnormal spine and thoracic cage development. World J Orthop 2013; 4:167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Dang X, Zhao L, Ren J, Zhang L, Sun J. Factors relating to curve progression in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with a brace. Eur Spine J 2015; 24:244–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rutkowska-Kucharska A, Szpala A, Pieciuk E. Symmetry of muscle activity during abdominal exercises. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2009; 11:25–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guo LY, Wang YL, Huang YH, Yang CH, Hou YY, Harn HI, You YL. Comparison of the electromyographic activation level and unilateral selectivity of erector spinae during different selected movements. Int J Rehabil Res 2012; 35:345–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Reuber M, Schultz A, McNeill T, Spencer D. Trunk muscle myoelectric activities in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983; 8:447–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hopf C, Scheidecker M, Steffan K, Bodem F, Eysel P. Gait analysis in idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery: a comparison of the pre-and postoperative muscle activation pattern. Eur Spine J 1998; 7:6–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Du HG, Ye SL, Xu JY, Jiang Z, Song HQ, Yu JW. Application of surface electromyography in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with traditional spinal balanced therapy. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2013; 26:914–917.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheung J, Halbertsma JP, Veldhuizen AG, Sluiter WJ, Maurits NM, Cool JC, van Horn JR. A preliminary study on electromyographic analysis of the paraspinal musculature in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2005; 14:130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, El Shorouk City, 11957, Cairo, Egypt

    Enas Abdallah Elattar MD, Nayera Z. Saber & Dina A. Farrag

Authors
  1. Enas Abdallah Elattar MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nayera Z. Saber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dina A. Farrag
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enas Abdallah Elattar MD.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elattar, E.A., Saber, N.Z. & Farrag, D.A. Predictive factors for progression of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 1-year study. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 42, 111–119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.163943

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.163943

Keywords