Skip to main content

Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided local steroid injection to the wrist for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: Is it worth it?

Abstract

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is caused by compression of the median nerve at the wrist level and the most frequent entrapment neuropathy in the upper limb. It can be treated with surgical or non-surgical methods. When nonsurgical treatment is indicated, a local corticosteroid injection into the carpal tunnel can be used to reduce pain and tingling sensation. To assess the clinical outcomes and effectiveness of patient satisfaction following ultrasound-guided steroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Results

The study comprises 44 female (73%) and 16 (27%) male patients, with a mean age of 57 (27–84) years. Thirty-one patients were left-handed and 29 right-handed. Twenty-six (43%) injections were performed on the right side, 8 (13%) on the left, and 26 were bilateral. Fifty-six hands of thirty-seven (70%) patients reported significant improvement symptoms, five (8%) had temporary improvement with recurrence, seventeen patients (28%) failed to improve, and one patient’s symptoms have resolved before intervention. Among temporary responders and nonresponders, two were referred to the neurologist for further evaluation. Out of twenty patients, fourteen patients (23%) had surgical decompression of carpal tunnel with complete resolution of symptoms, four patients had opted for repeat injections, and two patients refused any further intervention.

Conclusions

The use of ultrasound-guided injection for the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome is a practical procedure before offering surgical treatment. It is also appropriate for the patient with significant medical problems or not willing to undergo surgical intervention. Its ultrasound guide reduces injection-related complications, improves patient satisfaction, is cost-effective, and improves patient compliance.

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common compression neuropathy affecting the upper limb, which results from entrapment of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel [1]. Carpal tunnel syndrome adversely affects daily activities, limits work capacity, and impacts general health and quality of life [2, 3]. In a primary care population, prevalence has been reported to be 3720 to 5700 per 100,000 people in a year, with an annual incidence of 72 to 8200 per 100,000. CTS is more common in women with a female to male ratio ranging between 0.78 and 9.66 [4].

Classically, carpal tunnel syndrome causes discomfort, paraesthesia, and numbness in the median nerve distribution. Nocturnal symptoms are often clinically significant causing sleep disturbance, and bilateral symptoms occur in more than 50% of patients [2]. The diagnosis is based on clinical history, examination findings, and provocation tests [5]. Two common provocation tests use for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome are Phalen’s sign, with a sensitivity of 10 to 73% and specificity of 55–86%, and Tinel’s sign with 8–100% page sensitivity and 55–87% specificity [5, 6]. The electrophysiological test is routinely performed to establish the diagnosis by a primary care physician. Surgical management is considered for severe cases as described by Bland JD on the neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome [6, 7].

There exists no consensus on the best primary care management for mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. Several treatments, supported by clinical guidelines, include night-resting splints and local corticosteroid injection in the carpal tunnel [8, 9]. In severe cases or cases that failed with conservative treatment, surgery is considered the treatment of choice. Several studies reported outcomes following injection, and those were given in clinical settings using anatomical landmarks. Injection into the carpal tunnel reduces pain and tingling sensation. The initial response rate to a single steroid injection is about 70% with an estimate suggesting that 92% may have relapsed by 2 years. Therefore, accurate injection into the carpal tunnel is very important [10]; however, direct injection can cause median nerve injury. The corticosteroid can leak into the surrounding tissue and lead to complications such as fat tissue atrophy and skin color changes [10, 11]. Ultrasound (US) can confirm the correct site for injection within the carpal tunnel, reduce patient discomfort, and minimize median nerve injury and other complications [12].

This retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of symptoms relief, reduce surgical intervention, and patient satisfaction following ultrasound-guided injection steroid injection for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 60 patients who underwent local steroid injection under ultrasound guidance by the musculoskeletal radiologist between June 2017 and June 2018. All patients had nerve conduction studies, and reports were based on the universally accepted grading system (Table 1). Inclusion criteria were all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome both clinically and mild and moderate grade in nerve conduction studies [7], who failed to improve symptoms using conservative options in the form of analgesia and splint for 3 months. Exclusion criteria were patients with negative nerve conduction study and severe compression reported in nerve conduction study [7] and secondary causes for clinical symptoms. The audit has been registered, and the local ethical committee has approved it.

Table 1 Grading of nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome (Bland JD [7])

Patients were counseled about the steroid injection, and the procedure was explained in detail, including the benefits and drawbacks. Once they agreed, a request was made for a muscular-skeletal-radiologist to perform a US-guided injection. Patients were advised to wear splints until the injection could be administered. A specific protocol was used, and verbal consent was obtained before the procedure. Patients were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) severity scale at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

Procedure

A mixture of 40 mg methylprednisolone and 1% lidocaine hydrochloride was injected under aseptic precaution by using US guidance (ACUSON Sequoia system powered by BioAcoustic technology). The patient was advised to use their hand as normal without any restriction.

Results

This was a retrospective study of 86 hands in 60 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided injection for carpal tunnel syndrome following failed conservative treatment between June 2017 and June 2018. The study comprises 44 female (73%) and 16 (27%) male patients, with a mean age of 57 (27–84) years. Thirty-one patients were left-handed and 29 right-handed. Most of the patients were retired, and 7 were unemployed/housewives; other occupations included builders (2), hairdressers (2), chefs (2), drivers (1), and nurses (4). There were 26 (43%) injections performed on the right hand, 8 (13%) on the left, and 26 (43%) were bilateral. Electrophysiological tests confirmed 66 hands with a moderate grade and 20 hands with a mild grade compression.

Fifty-six hands of thirty-seven (61%) patients reported significant improvement symptoms, five (8%) had temporary improvement with recurrence, seventeen patients (28%) failed to improve, and one patient’s symptoms have improved/ resolved before intervention. Among the patients in the “no or temporary response group,” there were some observations found correlated with their comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus (3), cervical spine pathology (1), previous wrist surgery due to fracture ORIF wrist (1), elbow joint arthritis (1), previous shoulder surgery (1), and hyperthyroidism (1). Eight (13%) of nonresponders have had no significant past medical history.

Twenty patients were offered surgery after 4 months, and two were referred to a neurologist for associated cervical radiculopathy among the 22 patients who were temporary responders and nonresponders. Fourteen patients (23%) had surgical decompression of the carpal tunnel, which resulted in complete symptom resolution; four patients chose repeat injections, and three patients refused any further intervention. At the 6-month follow-up, patients with resolved or improved symptoms were discharged.

Discussions

Carpal tunnel syndrome occurs due to compression of the median nerve at the wrist which causes pain, tingling, and altered sensation or numbness on the thumb, index, middle, and radial half of the ring finger. Carpal tunnel syndrome is routinely classified as mild, moderate, or severe, although criteria for this categorization are not well established, and there is a lack of an accepted gold standard for diagnosis, particularly regarding the inclusion of electrophysiological tests [1, 5,6,7, 13].

In some countries, including the UK, primary care access to nerve conduction studies is variable or limited. As such, these investigations are typically reserved for indeterminate diagnoses and are not always required routinely in primary care for mild or moderate cases to guide decisions regarding initial conservative treatment [6, 13, 14].

Steroid injection has a good short-term effect [13,14,15]. Gelberman et al. reported that the maximal improvement in symptoms occurred 1 month to 2 months after steroid injection [16]. Landmark-guided (also known as blind) corticosteroid injection was used in the trial as this technique is the standard used in primary care where access to ultrasound is usually rare [16,17,18]. Steroid injection is effective mainly through its local anti-inflammatory mechanism [5].

But Hui, A-C et al. [19] and Celik, G. et al. [20] and Hofer, M. et al. [21] found that the long-term effect of steroid injection is not good enough and some patients cannot avoid surgery or multiple injections eventually. Therefore, sometimes, it is still necessary to decompress the transverse ligament carpal ligament of the wrist to reduce compression mechanically. But the surgical release is often rejected by patients due to its scar neuroma and complex medical conditions. US-guided corticosteroid injections are of similar efficacy in reducing symptoms and improving function and electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome and reducing injection-related complications.

Smith et al. [22] developed the ulnar approach methods for the performance of US-guided carpal tunnel injection in which the transducer is placed transversely along the wrist crease at the entrance to the carpal tunnel, and the needle is passed into the skin on the ulnar side of the proximal carpal tunnel at the level of the distal wrist crease. Technically, the ulnar approach combines the advantages of longitudinal needle visualization with the flexibility of transverse carpal tunnel imaging. In addition, this approach is easy to learn.

Racasan and Dubert reported median nerve irritation following carpal tunnel injection as a frequent problem and identified the fact that the median nerve extends ulnar to the palmaris longus tendon in most hands. They reported that the safest location of injection is through the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon [10]. Although steroid injections are routinely administered for CTS, direct needle injury of the median nerve is the major complication of these injections. The safest location of the injection remains controversial. Several cases of median nerve injury during CTS injection have been reported [11].

Limitations

In our series, radiologists used ultrasound to identify the structure and location before injecting steroids. This helped safe insertion of the needle in the carpal tunnel without causing damage to neighboring tissue and enables visualization of the distribution of the injected substance. Our study is limited by the small number of patients in the cohort and the lack of longer follow-up. We recommend that additional research with larger samples with longer follow-up and to exclude systemic causes of neuropathy be conducted in the future to achieve more accurate and comprehensive results. Efficacy and outcome were only evaluated subjectively, without the use of a validated score.

Conclusions

The use of ultrasound-guided injection for the treatment of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome is an effective, safe, and practical procedure to reduce pain intensity and symptom severity, thereby improving hand functionality. It is also appropriate for the patient with significant medical problems or not willing to undergo surgical intervention. It reduces injection-related complications, improves patient satisfaction, is cost-effective, and improves patient compliance. We believe that the satisfaction rate can still improve by appropriate diagnosis and correct patient selection.

Availability of data and materials

Yes.

Abbreviations

CTS:

Carpal tunnel syndrome

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. Aroori S, Spence RA (2008) Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J 77:6–17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bland JD, Rudolfer SM (2003) Clinical surveillance of carpal tunnel syndrome in two areas of the United Kingdom, 1991–2001. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74:1674–1679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R et al (1999) Symptoms, disability, and quality of life in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 24:398–404.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton C, Chesterton L, Chen CF et al (2018) Trends in the prevalence, incidence and surgical management of carpal tunnel syndrome between 1993 and 2013: an observational analysis in UK primary care records. BMJ Open 8:e020166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C et al (2016) Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol 15:1273–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bland JDP (2017) Nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome: gold standard or unnecessary evil? Orthopedics 40:198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bland JD (2000) A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 23(8):1280–1283. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4598(200008)23:8. <1280::aid-mus20>3.0.co;2-y..

  8. Graham B, Peljovich AE, Afra R et al (2016) The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based clinical practice guideline on management of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1750–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huisstede BM, Friden J, Coert JH et al (2014) Carpal tunnel syndrome: hand surgeons, hand therapists, and physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians agree on a multidisciplinary treatment guideline–results from the European HAND GUIDE study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95:2253–2263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Racasan O, Dubert T (2005) The safest location for steroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br. 30:412–414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swan MC, Oestreich K (2009) Re: median nerve damage following local corticosteroid injection for the symptomatic relief of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur. 34:135–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grassi W, Farina A, Filippucci E et al (2002) Intralesional therapy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a sonographic-guided approach. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 20:73–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu YT, Deol AK, Sears ED (2021) The association between electrodiagnostic severity and treatment recommendations for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 46(2):92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.020 Epub 2020 Oct 31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi Q, Bobos P, Lalone EA, Warren L, MacDermid JC (2020) Comparison of the short-term and long-term effects of surgery and nonsurgical intervention in treating carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hand (N Y). 15(1):13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558944718787892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ertem DH, Sirin TC, Yilmaz I (2019) Electrophysiological responsiveness and clinical outcomes of local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 77(9):638–645. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20190106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gelberman RH, Aronson D, Weisman MH (1980) Carpaltunnel syndrome. Results of a prospective trial of steroid injection and splinting. J Bone Joint Surg 62(7):1181–1184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Eslamian F, Eftekharsadat B, Babaei-Ghazani A et al (2017) A randomized prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided and landmark-guided steroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Clin Neurophysiol 34:107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ustun N, Tok F, Yagz AE, Kizil N, Korkmaz I, Karazincir S et al (2013) Ultrasound-guided vs. blind steroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a single-blind randomized prospective study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil Assoc Acad Physiatrists. 92(11):999–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui ACF, Wong S, Leung CH et al (2005) A randomized controlled trial of surgery vs steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology 64(12):2074–2078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Celik G, Ilik MK (2016) Effects of two different treatment techniques on the recovery parameters of moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a six-month follow-up study. J Clin Neurophysiol 33(2):166–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hofer M, Ranstam J, Atroshi I (2021) Extended follow-up of local steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 4(10):e2130753. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30753.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith J, Wisniewski SJ, Finnoff JT et al (2008) (2018) Sonographically guided carpal tunnel injections: the ulnar approach. J Ultrasound Med. 27:1485–1490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No.

Funding

No funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first two authors involved in data collection and writing up, the next two authors contributed in writing up, and the last author did the corrections. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poornanand Goru.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local governance ethical approval done with permission number 8588.

Consent for publication

Yes from all authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goru, P., Butaliu, G.C., Verma, G.G. et al. Effectiveness of ultrasound-guided local steroid injection to the wrist for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: Is it worth it?. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 49, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43166-022-00121-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43166-022-00121-5

Keywords