Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Published:

Evaluation of different electrophysiological studies in the detection of urinary and sexual dysfunction in diabetic women

Abstract

Background

Diabetes mellitus is the most common cause of urinary and sexual dysfunction. Although diabetes mellitus can be diagnosed clearly and simply, diabetic neuropathy and diabetic cystopathy (DC) can progress insidiously over time without any symptoms, manifesting itself at a later stage, which increases the risk of secondary complications. Therefore, early diagnosis in the asymptomatic stage of DC with a simple noninvasive method is of utmost importance.

Aim of the work

To evaluate the different electrophysiological studies [including genital sympathetic skin response (SSR), somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) of the tibial nerve] in the early detection of urinary and sexual dysfunction in diabetic women.

Patients and methods

This study was carried out on 30 diabetic women and 10 healthy women served as a control group. All patients were divided into two groups (group I and group II) with respect to lower urinary tract symptoms and signs. They were subjected to a full assessment of medical history, full neurological examination, and assessment by the female sexual function index questionnaire. Urodynamic studies including: uroflowmetry and cystometry were carried out for all patients. Electrophysiological studies were carried out for both patients and controls and included nerve conduction studies of both tibial and peroneal nerves, sensory nerve conduction studies of both sural nerves, SSEP of the tibial nerve and genital, hand, and foot SSR.

Results

In group I: Abnormal findings of motor studies were recorded in 1/15 (6.6%) patients, prolonged genital SSR in one patient (6.6%) and absent in two patients 2/15 (13.3%). Prolonged SSEP were recorded in 2/15 (13.3%) of patients. As regards urodynamic study, abnormal findings were detected in 3 patients (20%). In group II: Abnormal findings of motor studies were recorded in 8/15 (53.3%) patients, absent foot SSR in four patients (26.6%), absent genital SSR in seven (46.6%) patients. Prolonged SSEP P40 were recorded in 6/15 (40%). As regards urodynamic study, abnormal findings were detected in 12 patients (80%). There was statistically significant difference between both groups as regards all electerophysiologic parameters except foot latency. There was a statistically highly significant difference between urodynamic diagnosis and genital SSR and SSEP P40 of tibial nerve.

Conclusion

Although urodynamic is essential for the actual diagnosis and the detection of variable pathophysiological changes, electrophysiological studies represent an easy, valid, and noninvasive objective method for the evaluation of DC and sexual dysfunction.

References

  1. Edwards JL, Vincent AM, Cheng HT, Feldman EL. Diabetic neuropathy: mechanisms to management. Pharmacol Ther 2008; 120:1–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koubaa S, Ben Salah FZ, Miri I, Ghorbel S, Lebib S, Dziri C, Rokbani L. Neurogenic bladder in diabetes mellitus. Tunis Med 2009; 87: 279–282.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burakgazi AZ, Alsowaity B, Burakgazi ZA, Unal D, Kelly JJ. Bladder dysfunction in peripheral neuropathies. Muscle Nerve 2012; 45:2–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gomez CS, Kanagarajah P, Gousse AE. Bladder dysfunction in patients with diabetes. Curr Urol Rep 2011; 12:416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yenilmez A, Kebapci N, Isikli B, Hamarat M, Donmez T. Morbidity after urodynamic study in diabetic patients. Acta Diabetol 2008; 46:197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Weiss L, Silver J, Weiss J. Easy EMG. A guide to performing nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Butterworth- Heinemann/Elsevier Inc.; 2004.

  7. Soliman E. 2005. Diabetic neuropathy. [cited March 27, 2012]; Available athtpp//www.emedicine-diabeticneuropathyarticlebyEmadsoliman,MD,Msc.htm. [Accessed 1 July 2012].

  8. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2006; 29:543–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abrams B, Cardozo L, Fall M. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21:167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen R, Browen C, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, Dagostino R. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26:191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kucera P, Goldenberg Z, Kurca E. Sympathetic skin response: review of the method and its clinical use. Bratisl Lek Listy 2004; 105:108–116.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pfisterer MH, Griffiths DJ, Rosenberg L, Schaefer W, Resnick NM. Parameters of bladder function in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal continent women without detrusor overactivity. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26:356–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daneshgari F, Liu G, Birder L, Hanna-Mitchell AT, Chacko S. Diabetic bladder dysfunction: current translational knowledge. J Urol 2009; 182 (6 Suppl): S18–S26.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rapidi CA, Karandreas N, Katsifotis C, Benroubi M, Petropoulou K, Theodorou C. A combined urodynamic and electrophysiological study of diabetic cystopathy. Neurourol Urodyn 2006; 25:32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Soylu A, Akinci A, Yilmaz U, Sarier M, Aslan M, Ozcan C. Sympathetic skin responses in type-1 diabetic children: relationship to urodynamic findings. Neurourol Urodyn 2006; 25:243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kebapci N, Yenilmez A, Efe B, Entok E, Demirusutu C. Bladder dysfunction in type 2 diabetic patients. Neurourol Urodyn 2007; 26:814–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Esteghamati A, Rashidi A, Nikfallah A, Yousefizadeh A. The association between urodynamic findings and microvascular complications in patients with long-term type 2 diabetes but without voiding symptoms. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 78:42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bansal R, Agarwal MM, Modi M, Mandal AK, Singh SK. Urodynamic profile of diabetic patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: association of diabetic cystopathy with autonomic and peripheral neuropathy. Urology 2011; 77:699–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gerstenberger EP, Rosen RC, Brewer JV, Meston CM, Brotto LA, Wiegel M, Sand M. Sexual desire and the female sexual function index (FSFI): a sexual desire cutpoint for clinical interpretation of the FSFI in women with and without hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2010; 7:3096–3103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Takahashi M, Inokuchi T, Watanabe C, Saito T, Kai I. The female sexual function index (FSFI): development of a Japanese version. J Sex Med 2011; 8:2246–2254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abu Ali RM, Al Hajeri RM, Khader YS, Shegem NS, Ajlouni KM. Sexual dysfunction in Jordanian diabetic women. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1580–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Esposito K, Maiorino MI, Bellastella G, Giugliano F, Romano M, Giugliano D. Determinants of female sexual dysfunction in type 2 diabetes. Int J Impot Res 2010; 22:179–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wallner LP, Sarma AV, Kim C. Sexual functioning among women with and without diabetes in the Boston Area Community Health Study. J Sex Med 2010; 7:881–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fatemi SS, Tachavi SM. Evaluation of sexual function in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Vasc Dis Res 2009; 6:38–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Secil Y, Özdedeli K, Altay B, Aydog˘ du I, Yilmaz C, Ertekin C. Sympathetic skin response recorded from genital region in normal and diabetic women. Neurophysiol Clin 2005; 35:11–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sec¸il Y, Yetimalar Y, Gedizlioglu M, Arpaci E, Tokuc¸oglu F, Inceoglu Kendir A, et al. Sexual dysfunction and sympathetic skin response recorded from the genital region in women with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 2007; 13: 742–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaplan SA, Blaivas JG. Urodynamic findings in patients with diabetic cystopathy. J Urol 1995; 153:342–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rodic B, Curt A, Dietz V, Schurch B. Bladder neck incompetence in patients with spinal cord injury: significance of sympathetic skin response. J Urol 2000; 163:1223–1227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ueda T, Yoshimura N, Yoshida O. Diabetic cystopathy: relationship to autonomic neuropathy detected by sympathetic skin response. J Urol 1997; 157:580–584.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Podnar S. Neurophysiology of the neurogenic lower urinary tract disorders. Clinl Neurophysiol 2007; 118:1423–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. McGuire EJ, Shi-Chun Z, Horwinski ER. Treatment of motor and sensory detrusor instability by electrical stimulation. J Urol 1982; 129:78–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. La Portilla F, Rada R, Vega J, Gonzalez CA, Cisneros N, Maldonado VH. Evaluation of the use of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: preliminary results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52:1427–1433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanan El Sebaie El Hefnawy MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Hefnawy, H.E.S., El Arousy, N.H., Shaker, H.S. et al. Evaluation of different electrophysiological studies in the detection of urinary and sexual dysfunction in diabetic women. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 40, 39–49 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7123/01.ERR.0000428090.79340.78

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.7123/01.ERR.0000428090.79340.78

Keywords