Skip to main content
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

The value of neuromuscular ultrasound in relation to clinical and electrophysiological testing in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome

Abstract

Background

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) diagnosis has long been challenging and controversial with no available golden standard diagnostic test.

Objectives To assess the value of NMUS as a new diagnostic tool for TOS and compare it with other clinical and electrophysiological studies.

Patients and Methods

This study was conducted on 20 patients with clinical TOS and 10 healthy controls. They were subjected to history taking, clinical examination, provocative tests, functional assessment using shoulder pain and disability index, electrophysiological and imaging studies including x-ray and NMUS. Pectoralis minor muscle deformation and brachial plexus compression was detected using NMUS by measuring the pectoral bowing ratio (PBR), PBR is significant if >10% on provocation with arm abduction.

Results

In this case control study, mean age of 20 patients was 34.20±9.52. Female:male ratio was 13:7 without significant difference between patients and controls regarding age or sex. Mean pain and disability scores were 73±13.42 and 55.30 ±15.68 respectively. Compound medial antebrachial cutaneous (MAC) nerve conduction and F-wave studies was positive in 85% of patients and none of the controls. Similarly, NMUS positive finding was detected in 75% of patients and none of the controls with highly significant difference between two groups, P<0.01. Diagnostic accuracy (DA) of NMUS for TOS was 83.3% comparable to x-ray and compound MAC, F-wave studies (DA=93.3%, 90% respectively).

Conclusion

Neuromuscular ultrasonography is an important, painless, sensitive tool for assessment of TOS. It is complementary to other imaging and electrophysiological studies and their combination could help in objective diagnosis of TOS.

References

  1. Peet RM, Henriksen JD, Anderson TP, Martin GM. Thoracic-outlet syndrome. Evaluation of a therapeutic exercise program. Mayo Clin Proc 1956; 31:281–287.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dahlstrom K, Olinger A. Descriptive anatomy of the interscalene triangle and the costoclavicular space and their relationship to thoracic outlet syndrome: a study of 60 cadavers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2012; 35:396–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roos DB. The place for scalenectomy and first-rib resection in thoracic outlet syndrome. Surgery 1999; 92:1077–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gillard J, Perez-Cousin M, Hachulla E, Remy J, Hurtevent JF, Vinckier L, et al. Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome: contribution of provocative tests, ultrasonography, electrophysiology, and helical computed tomography in 48 patients. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68:416–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seror P. Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve conduction study, a new tool to demonstrate mild lower brachial plexus lesions. A report of 16 cases. Clin Neurophysiol 2004; 115:2316–2322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Machanic B, Sanders R. Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve measurements to diagnose neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Ann Vasc Surg 2008; 22:248–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kovacs P, Gruber H. Interventional techniques. In Peer S, Bodner G, eds. High resolution sonography of the peripheral nervous system. Berlin: Springer 2008. 169–185

  8. Sucher B. Ultrasonography-guided osteopathic manipulative treatment for a patient with thoracic outlet syndrome. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2011; 111:543–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roach K, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4:143–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Preston D, Shapero L. Detailed nerve conduction studies. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier 2005. 117–143

  11. Cuetter AC, Bartoszek DM. The thoracic outlet syndrome: controversies, overdiagnosis, overtreatment, and recommendations for management. Muscle Nerve 1989; 12:410–419.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Filler AG. MR neurography and brachial plexus neurolysis in the management of thoracic outlet syndromes. In: Yao JST, Pearce WH, editors. Advances in vascular surgery. Chicago (IL): Precept Press; 2002. p. 499–523.

  13. Illig KA, Donahue D, Duncan A, Freischlag J,Gelabert H, Johansen K, et al. Reporting standards of the society for vascular surgery for thoracic outlet syndrome. J Vasc Surg 2016; 64:23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsao BE, Ferrante MA, Wilbourn AJ, Shields RW. Electrodiagnostic features of true neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Muscle Nerve 2014; 49:724–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moore R, Wei LY. Venous thoracic outlet syndrome. Vasc Med 2015; 2:182–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Weaver ML, Lum YW. New diagnostic and treatment modalities for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Kjaer A, ed. Diagnostics 2017; 7:28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roos DB, Owens JC. Thoracic outlet syndrome. Arch Surg 1966; 93:71–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Patterson GA. Evaluation of patients with thoracic outlet syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1993; 18:292–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Finlayson HC, O’Connor RJ, Brasher PM, Travlos A. Botulinum toxin injection for management of thoracic outlet syndrome: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Pain 2011; 152:2023–2028.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trisan RL, Cruz-Jimenez M. Provocative F-waves may help in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome: a report of three cases. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82:712–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Winkel D, Matthijs O, Phelps V. Diagnosis and treatment of the upper extremities: nonoperative orthopaedic medicine and manual therapy. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dina A. Farrag MD.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work noncommercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nassar, N.M., Yasaky, A.Z., Farrag, D.A. et al. The value of neuromuscular ultrasound in relation to clinical and electrophysiological testing in the diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 45, 140–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_41_18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_41_18

Keywords