Skip to main content

Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the treatment of chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.

Patients and methods

This study was carried out on 30 patients with calcific and noncalcific supraspinatus tendinopathy for more than 3 months. A clinical assessment was performed for all patients including pain scoring by the visual analog scale and full shoulder examination at the start of the study and 6 weeks later. Shoulder ultrasound was performed at the start of the study. Fifteen patients received four sessions of radial shockwave therapy (Intelect Radial Shockwave, UK) 3 bar pressure, 2000 pulses, 20Hz. Fifteen patients received a single ultrasound-guided subacromial steroid injection (1ml triamcinolone 40mg and 1ml lidocaine).

Results

Both groups showed a statistically significant improvement in pain relief (visual analog scale) and clinical examination: tenderness, shoulder range of motion, and muscle power. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups.

Conclusion

Radial shockwave therapy has no additional benefit over ultrasound-guided steroid injection in the short term in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.

References

  1. Huisstede BM, Gebremariam L, Van der Sande R, Hay EM, Koes BW. Evidence for effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy (ESWT) to treat calcific and non-calcific rotator cuff tendinosis – A systematic review. Man Ther 2011; 16:419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Galasso O, Amelio E, Riccelli DA, et al. Short-term outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of chronic non-calcific tendinopathy of the supraspinatus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13:86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bas de Witte P, Selten JW, Navas A, et al. Calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff: a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided needling and lavage versus subacromial corticosteroids. Am J Sports Med 2013; 41:1665–1673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Sande R, Rinkel WD, Gebremariam L, et al. Subacromial impingement syndrome: effectiveness of pharmaceutical interventions-nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid, or other injections: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94:961–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bazzocchi A, Pelotti P, Serraino S, et al. Ultrasound imaging-guided percutaneous treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendinitis: success in short-term outcome. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abate M, Salini V, Schiavone C, Andia I. Clinical benefits and drawbacks of local corticosteroids injections in tendinopathies. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016:1744–1764.

  7. Uhthoff HK, Loehr JW. Calcific tendinopathy of the rotator cuff: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1997; 5:183–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loppolo F, Tattoli M, Di Sante L, Venditto T, Tognolo L, et al. Clinical improvement and resorption of calcifications in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder after shock wave therapy at 6 months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94:1699–1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Avancini-Dobrovic V, Frlan-Vrgoc L, Stamenkovic D, et al. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of shoulder calcific tendinitis. Coll Antropol 2011; 35(Supp. 2):221–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zheng X, Li K, Wei Y, et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus corticosteroid for treatment of shoulder pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014; 95:1824–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hong JY, Yoon SH, Moon DJ, et al. Comparison of high and low dose corticosteroid in subacromial injection for periarticular shoulder disorder: a randomized, triple blind placebo controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92:1951–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kvalvaag E, Ivar Brox J, Engebrestsen KB, et al. Is radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with supervised exercises more effective than sham rESWT and SE in patients with subacromial shoulder pain? Study protocol for a double-blind randomized sham sontrolled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16:248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Louwerens JK, Veltman ES, Van Noort A, et al. The effectiveness of high-energy extracorporeal shockwave therapy versus ultrasound-guided needling versus arthroscopic surgery in the management of chronic calcific rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 2016; 32:165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li W, Zhang SH, Yang QI, et al. Effect of extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for treating patients with chronic rotator cuff tendonitis. Med J 2017; 96:35.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arirachakaran A, Boonard M, Yamaphai S, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy, ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage, corticosteroid injection and combined treatment for the treatment of rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy: a network meta-analysis of RCTs. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017; 27:381–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu YC, Tsai WC, Tu YK, Tung-Yang Y. Comparative effectiveness of non-operative treatments for chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98:1678–1692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lamiaa Emad E. El Ghandour MSc.

Additional information

This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zamzam, M., El Yasaki, A., El Garabawy, N. et al. Shockwave therapy versus local steroid injection in chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 46, 141–147 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_16_18

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_16_18

Keywords