Skip to main content
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Electrophysiological study of Martin—Gruber anastomosis in a sample of Egyptians

Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation volume 44, pages 153–158 (2017)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

Martin–Gruber anastomosis (MGA) is one of the most common anomalous innervations present in the body. Missing these anomalous innervations may easily be mistaken for technical pitfalls or even for actual pathology.

Aim

The aim of the current study was to determine the presence and the frequency of MGA by electrophysiological examination in a sample of Egyptian subjects.

Subjects and methods

It is a cross-sectional study of consecutive apparently healthy volunteers. The study included 200 forearms from 100 apparently healthy Egyptian volunteers in a single-center public-hospital-based electromyography laboratory. Electrophysiological studies in the form of motor conduction study for the median and ulnar nerves were performed by recording the hypothenar, first dorsal inerosseous, and thenar muscles. Qualitative data were analyzed using Pearson’s Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

The present study included 69 (69%) women. MGA was found in 39 (19.5%) forearms of 26 (26%) subjects electrophysiologically. There was no statistical significant difference between the occurrence of MGA in men versus women (P=0.127). The most common form was MGA to the first dorsal interosseous muscle. It was present in 30 (15%) forearms of 24 (24%) subjects. MGA to thenar muscles was present in 13 (6.5%) forearms of 12 (12%) subjects. MGA to the abductor digiti minimi muscle was present in five (2.5%) forearms of five (5%) subjects.

Conclusion

Martin–Gruber anastomosis is present in Egyptians. The frequency of occurrence of MGA in a sample of Egyptian subjects was found to be 26% in electrophysiological examination.

References

  1. Sarikcioglu L, Sindel S, Ozkaynak S, Aydin H. Median and ulnar nerve communication in the forearm: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. Med Sci Monit 2003; 9:BR351–BR356.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pawar S, Gathe B, Jain AP, Singh R. Electrophysiologic study of Martin-Gruber anastomosis in central Indian subjects. Int J Biol Med Res 2011; 2:1165–1167.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders: clinical-electrophysiologic correlations. 3rd ed. London, UK: Elsevier; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Dijk JG, Bouma PAD. Recognition of the Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20:887–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Budak F, Gonenc Z. Innervation anomalies in upper and lower extremities (an electrophysiological study). Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 39:231–234.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KS, Oh CS, Chung IH, Sunwoo IN. An anatomic study of the Martin-Gruber anastomosis: electrodiagnostic implications. Muscle Nerve 2005; 31:95–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amoiridis G. Median-ulnar nerve communications and anomalous innervation of the intrinsic hand muscles: an electrophysiological study. Muscle Nerve 1992; 15:576–579.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crutchfield CA, Gutmann L. Hereditary aspects of median-ulnar nerve communications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980; 43:53–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee SA, Kim WK, Lee MC, Sunwoo IN, Kim KW. The electrodiagnostic findings in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Korean Neurol Assoc 1994; 12:87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leibovic SJ, Hastings H. Martin-Gruber revisited. J Hand Surg 1992; 17:47–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodriguez-Niedenführ M, Vazquez T, Parkin I, Logan B, Saudo JR. Martin-Gruber anastomosis revisited. Clin Anat 2002; 15:129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Taams KO. Martin-Gruber connections in South Africa. An anatomical study. J Hand Surg Br 1997; 22:328–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iyer V, Fenichel GM. Normal median nerve proximal latency in carpal tunnel syndrome: a clue to coexisting Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1976; 39:449–452.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutmann L. Median ulnar nerve communication and carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977; 40:982–986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saba EK. Median versus ulnar medial thenar motor recording in diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Egypt Rheumatol 2015; 37:139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasegawa O, Matsumoto S, Iino M, Kirigaya N, Mimura E, Wada N, Gondo G. Prevalence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis on motor nerve conduction studies. Brain Nerve 2001; 53:161–164.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. University of Cambridge Computing Service. Statistical Package of Social Science, version 17. Documentation. London, UK: University of Cambridge Computing Service; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Davis DL, Johnson EW. Anatomy for the electromyographer. In: Pease WS, Lew HL, Johnson EW, editors. Johnson’s practical electromyography. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodriguez-Niedenführ M, Vazquez T, Ferreira B, Parkin I, Nearn L, Sañudo JR. Intramuscular Martin-Gruber anastomosis. Clin Anat 2002; 15: 135–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prates LC, de Carvalho VC, Prates JC, Langone F, Esquisatto MAM. The Martin-Gruber anastomosis in Brazilians: an anatomical study. Braz J Morphol Sci 2003; 20:177–180.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kayamori R. Electrodiagnosis in Martin-Gruber anastomosis. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 1987; 61:1367–1372.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gutmann L. AAEM mini-monograph #2: important anomalous innervations of the extremities. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16:339–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Erdem HR, Ergun S, Erturk C, Ozel S. Electrophysiological evaluation of the incidence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis in healthy subjects. Yousei Med J 2002; 43:291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kimura J, Murphy MJ, Varda DJ. Electrophysiological study of anomalous innervation of intrinsic hand muscles. Arch Neurol 1976; 33:842–844.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ballesteros LE, Forero PL, Quintero ID. Median ulnar nerves communication in the forearm: a study with autopsy material. Ital J Anat Embryol 2014; 3:232–240.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hodzic R, Piric N, Hodzic M, Kojic B. Electrophysiological evaluation of the incidence of Martin-Gruber anastomosis in healthy Bosnian population. Macedonin J Med Sci 2011; 4:376–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Felippe MM, Telles FL, Soares ACL, Felippe FM. Anastomosis between median nerve and ulnar nerve in the forearm. J Morphol Sci 2012; 1:23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ayramlou H, Najmi S, Yazdchi M, Naeimi M, Pourabolghasem S. Study of prevalence of Martin-Gruber anomaly in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Chronic Dis Ther 2015; 1:5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Valls-Sole J. Martin-Gruber anastomosis and unusual sensory innervation of the fingers: report of a case. Muscle Nerve, 1991; 14: 1099–1102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Uchida Y, Sugioka Y. Electrodiagnosis of Martin-Gruber connection and its clinical importance in peripheral nerve surgery. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17:54–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Robinson LP. Entrapment neuropathies and other focal neuropathies. In: Pease WS, Lew HL, Johnson EW, editors. Johnson’s practical electromyography. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. pp. 259–295.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Van Tieghem J, Vandendriessche G, Vanhecke J. Martin-Gruber anastomosis: the explanation for late diagnosis of severe ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987; 27:13–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brandsma JW, Birke JA, Sims DS. The Martin-Gruber innervated hand. J Hand Surg 1986; 11A:536–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kimura I, Ayyar DR, Lippmann SM. Electrophysiological verification of the ulnar to median nerve communications in the hand and forearm. Tohoku J Exp Med 1983; 141:269–274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rosen AD. Innervation of the hand: an electromyographic study. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1973; 13:175–178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Golovchinsky V. Ulnar-to-median anastomosis and its role in the diagnosis of lesions of the median nerve at the elbow and the wrist. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990; 30:31–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Stancic MF, Burgic N, Micovic V. Marinacci communication. Case report. J Neurosurg 2000; 92:860–862.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Santoro L, Rosato R, Caruso G. Median-ulnar nerve communications: electrophysiological demonstration of motor and sensory fiber crossover. J Neurol 1983; 229:227–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Simonetti S. Electrophysiological study of forearm sensory fiber crossover in Martin–Gruber anastomosis. Muscle Nerve 2001; 24: 380–386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, 21131, Alexandria, Egypt

    Emmanuel Kamal Aziz Saba (MD)

Authors
  1. Emmanuel Kamal Aziz Saba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Kamal Aziz Saba.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aziz Saba, E.K. Electrophysiological study of Martin—Gruber anastomosis in a sample of Egyptians. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 44, 153–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_12_17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/err.err_12_17

Keywords