Skip to main content
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Difference between early versus delayed postoperative physical rehabilitation protocol following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation volume 43, pages 137–142 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Early passive motion exercise has been the standard rehabilitation protocol following rotator cuff repair. However, recent research studies show that longer immobilization may enhance tendon healing.

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare early passive range of motion (ROM) exercise with a delayed rehabilitation protocol with regard to the effectiveness of stiffness reduction and functional improvements and rates of tendon healing in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for torn rotator cuffs.

Patients and methods

This study was performed on 164 patients having a full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus muscle that was repaired using the arthroscopic single-row suture anchor technique along with subacromial decompression. The patients were divided into two groups, early (group 1) and delayed ROM (group 2). In group 1, 78 patients were started on passive elevation and rotation exercises on the second day after surgery. In group 2, 86 patients had their shoulder immobilized for 6 weeks, after which passive motion exercise was started. Patients were followed-up clinically for a minimum of 12 months, and rotator cuff healing was assessed using MRI.

Results

Both groups had a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative results. As regards American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon scores, the early group improved from 45.4 preoperatively to 90.9 postoperatively (P<0.0001) and the delayed group improved from 44.59 preoperatively to 91.6 postoperatively (P<0.0001). As regards Constant score, the early group improved from 35.7 preoperatively to 86.5 postoperatively (P<0.0001) and the delayed group improved from 37.8 preoperatively to 88.1 postoperatively (P<0.0001). However, there were no statistically significant differences in rotator cuff healing between the two groups. The follow-up mean of visual analog scale was significantly better in group 2 compared with group 1 at 6 weeks postoperatively but no difference was found after 3 months. In contrast, ROM was better in group 1 compared with group 2 at 6 months postoperatively but no difference was found after 1 year.

Conclusion

Significant improvement in pain, ROM, and function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was seen at 1 year postoperatively, regardless of early or delayed postoperative rehabilitation protocols. However, early motion increases pain scores and may increase the possibility of rotator cuff retear but with early regain of ROM. A delayed rehabilitation protocol with immobilization for 6 weeks would be better for tendon healing without risk for retear or joint stiffness and easily convalescence with less postoperative pain.

References

  1. Rokito AS, Cuomo F, Gallagher MA, Zuckerman JD. Long-term functional outcome of repair of large and massive chronic tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999;81:991–997.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lastayo PC, Wright T, Jaffe R, Hartzel J. Continuous passive motion after repair of the rotator cuff. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:1002–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Keener JD, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K. Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:e29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy 2003;19:234–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to longterm stiffness?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:1034–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH. Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:815–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neer CS. Shoulder rehabilitation. In: Demarest RJ, editor. Shoulder reconstruction (ISBN 978-0721628325). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders;1990:487–533.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to longterm stiffness?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:1034–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dixon JS, Bird HA. Reproducibility along a 10 cm vertical visual analogue scale. Ann Rheum Dis 1981;40:87–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2002;11:587–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gusmer PB, Potter HG, Donovan WD, O’Brien SJ. MR imaging of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair. Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:559–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cofield RH. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985;67:974–979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Craig EV. Continuous passive motion in the rehabilitation of the surgically reconstructed shoulder. A preliminary report. Orthop Trans 1986;10:219.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dockery ML, Wright TW, Lastayo PC. Electromyography of the shoulder: an analysis of passive modes of exercise. Orthopedics 1998; 21: 1181–1184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. McCann PD, Wootten ME, Kadaba MP, Bigliani LU. A kinematic and electromyographic study of shoulder rehabilitation exercises. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;288:179–188.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gristina A, Craig E, Neviaser R, Norris T. Symposium: management of rotator cuff problems. Contemp Orthop 1990;20:621–646.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons BO, Gruson KI, Chen DD, Harrison AK, Gladstone J, Flatow EL. Does slower rehabilitation after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair lead to longterm stiffness?. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:1034–1039.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gimbel JA, van Kleunen JP, Williams GR, Thomopoulos S, Soslowsky LJ. Long durations of immobilization in the rat result in enhanced mechanical properties of the healing supraspinatus tendon insertion site. J Biomech Eng 2007;129:400–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thomopoulos S, Williams GR, Soslowsky LJ. Tendon to bone healing: differences in biomechanical, structural, and compositional properties due to a range of activity levels. J Biomech Eng 2003;125:106–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Arndt J, Clavert P, Mielcarek P, Bouchaib J, Meyer N, Kempf JF. French Society for Shoulder & Elbow (SOFEC). Immediate passive motion versus immobilization after endoscopic supraspinatus tendon repair: a prospective randomized study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98(Suppl):S131–S138.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. Prospective randomized study of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an early versus delayed postoperative physical therapy protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012;21:1450–1455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Düzgün I, Baltaci G, Atay OA. Comparison of slow and accelerated rehabilitation protocol after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: pain and functional activity. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2011;45:23–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH. Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?.. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:815–821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, 17 sheikh Ali Youssife street Moniera Kaser El Eeini, Cairo, Giza, Egypt

    Samar M. Fawzy

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Ahmed Rizk Mohamed, Ahmed K. Sameer & Ahmed S. Foad

Authors
  1. Samar M. Fawzy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed Rizk Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ahmed K. Sameer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed S. Foad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samar M. Fawzy.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work noncommercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fawzy, S.M., Mohamed, A.R., Sameer, A.K. et al. Difference between early versus delayed postoperative physical rehabilitation protocol following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 43, 137–142 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.189823

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.189823

Keywords