Skip to main content
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Download PDF

Manual therapy intervention in the treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: median nerve mobilization versus medical treatment

Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation volume 43, pages 27–34 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common entrapment neuropathy. Median nerve mobilization is a manual therapy intervention used for treating CTS.

Aim

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of median nerve mobilization in relieving manifestations of CTS when compared with conventional medical treatment.

Patients and methods

A total of 28 CTS patients were divided into two groups: patients in group I (n = 18) underwent median nerve mobilization, and those in group II (n = 10) underwent conventional medical treatment. Median nerve mobilization consisted of 18 treatments (three/week for 6 weeks). Patients were assessed for hand sensitivity, paresthesia, strength, pain, night awakening, thenar eminence atrophy, and were subjected to Phalen’s test, Tinel’s sign, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire’s Symptom Severity Scale (BCTQ-SSS) and Functional Status Scale (BCTQ-FSS), and sensory and motor conduction studies for median nerve at baseline and at 6 weeks after treatment.

Results

At baseline versus at 6 weeks, pain, sensation, paresthesia, tingling, Tinel’s signs, and Phalen’s test outcomes were significantly improved in both groups; wrist flexion and extension improved only in group I. The difference between group I and group II after 6 weeks was significant as regards tingling, pain, wrist flexion, and extension. BCTQ-SSS and BCTQ-FSS scores improved after 6 weeks compared with baseline in patients in group I, whereas in group II the improvement was observed in BCTQ-FSS; the difference between the groups was significant. Sensory nerve conduction velocity, sensory distal latency, sensory amplitude, distal motor latency, and motor amplitude were significantly improved after 6 weeks in group I. In addition, there was a change in the grade of CTS, whereas in group II there was improvement only in sensory nerve conduction velocity; the difference between the groups was not significant.

Conclusion

CTS improves after median nerve mobilization, which is better than conventional medical treatment. It provides support for the use of manual therapy in conservative management of CTS with satisfactory results.

References

  1. Anderson JM. Carpal tunnel syndrome: common, treatable, but not necessarily work related. J Controvers Med Claim 2007; 14:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atroshi I, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Tägil M, Petersson IF. Incidence of physician-diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171:943–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maddali Bongi S, Signorini M, Bassetti M, Del Rosso A, Orlandi M, De Scisciolo G. A manual therapy intervention improves symptoms in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a pilot study. Rheumatol Int 2013; 33:1233–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall S. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Evid 2001; 5:717–728.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Giacchi M. Carpal tunnel syndrome incidence in a general population. Neurology 2002; 58:289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka S, Wild DK, Cameron LL, Freund E. Association of occupational and non-occupational risk factors with the prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome in a national survey of the working population. Am J Ind Med 1997; 32:550–556.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ettema AM, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Wold LE, O’Byrne MM, Moran SL, An KN. Changes in the functional structure of the tenosynovium in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: a scanning electron microscope study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118:1413–1422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burke J, Buchberger DJ, Carey-Loghmani MT, Dougherty PE, Greco DS, Dishman JD. A pilot study comparing two manual therapy interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007; 30:50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75:1585–1592.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain 1997; 72:95–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seror P. Phalen’s test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13:383–385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuschner SH, Ebramzadeh E, Johnson D, Brien WW, Sherman R Tinel’s sign and Phalen’s test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthopedics 1992; 15:1297–1302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Young B, Young M, Stiens S. PM&R secrets: peripheral neuropathy of upper limb. Philadelphia, PA: Hanley & Belfeus Inc; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tal-Akabi A, Rushton A. An investigation to compare the effectiveness of carpal bone mobilisation and neurodynamic mobilisation as methods of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Man Ther 2000; 5:214–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baysal O, Altay Z, Ozcan C, Ertem K, Yologlu S, Kayhan A. Comparison of three conservative treatment protocols in carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60:820–828.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerritsen AA, de Krom MC, Struijs MA, Scholten RJ, de Vet HC, Bouter LM Conservative treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Neurol 2002; 249:272–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Feuerstein M, Burrell LM, Miller VI, Lincoln A, Huang GD, Berger R. Clinical management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a 12-year review of outcomes. Am J Ind Med 1999; 35:232–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282:153–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. De-la-Llave-RinconAI, Ortega-Santiago R, Ambite-Quesada S, Gil-Crujera A, Puentedura EJ, Valenza MC, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C. Response of pain intensity to soft tissue mobilization and neurodynamic technique: a series of 18 patients with chronic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2012; 35:420–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinar L, Enhos A, Ada S, Güngör N. Can we use nerve gliding exercises in women with carpal tunnel syndrome? Adv Ther 2005; 22:467–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Akalin E, El O, Peker O, Senocak O, Tamci S, Gülbahar S, et al. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with nerve and tendon gliding exercises. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81:108–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McDiarmid M, Oliver M, Ruser J, Gucer P. Male and female rate differences in carpal tunnel syndrome injuries: personal attributes or job tasks? Environ Res 2000; 83:23-32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shabir M. Surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Postgrad Med Inst 2004; 18:29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chiang HC, Ko YC, Chen SS, Yu HS, Wu TN, Chang PY. Prevalence of shoulder and upper-limb disorders among workers in the fish-processing industry. Scand J Work Environ Health 1993; 19:126–131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ferrero M, Pescarmona G, et al. The carpal tunnel syndrome – etiologic and prognostic role of biological and professional risk factors. Minerva Orthopedica Traumatologica 2001; 52:185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wilgis EF. Treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome. JAMA 2002; 288:1281–1282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tang X, Zhuang L, Lu Z. Carpal tunnel syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 262 cases and a one to one matched case–control study of 61 women pairs in relationship between manual housework and carpal tunnel syndrome. Chin Med J (Engl) 1999; 112:44–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Goodyear-Smith F, Arroll B. What can family physicians offer patients with carpal tunnel syndrome other than surgery? A systematic review of nonsurgical management. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2:267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muller M, Tsui D, Schnurr R, Biddulph-Deisroth L, Hard J, MacDermid JC. Effectiveness of hand therapy interventions in primary management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. J Hand Ther 2004; 17:210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rozmaryn LM, Dovelle S, Rothman ER, Gorman K, Olvey KM, Bartko JJ. Nerve and tendon gliding exercises and the conservative management of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther 1998; 11:171–179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. O’Connor D, Marshall S, Massy-Westropp N. Nonsurgical treatment (other than steroid injection) for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 18:3219.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Harter BTJr, McKiernan JEJr, Kirzinger SS, Archer FW, Peters CK, Harter KC. Carpal tunnel syndrome: surgical and non-surgical treatment. J Hand Surg 1993; 18A:734–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Heebner ML, Roddey TS. The effects of neural mobilization in addition to standard care in persons with carpal tunnel syndrome from a community hospital. J Hand Ther 2008; 21:229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Minia University, 61511, Minia, Egypt

    Faten I. Mohamed, Amal A. Hassan & Rasha A. Abdel-Magied MD

  2. Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Minia General Hospital, Minia, Egypt

    Reem N. Wageh

Authors
  1. Faten I. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amal A. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rasha A. Abdel-Magied MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Reem N. Wageh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasha A. Abdel-Magied MD.

Additional information

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamed, F.I., Hassan, A.A., Abdel-Magied, R.A. et al. Manual therapy intervention in the treatment of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: median nerve mobilization versus medical treatment. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 43, 27–34 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.177424

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.177424

Keywords

  • carpal tunnel syndrome
  • manual therapy
  • median nerve mobilization
  • nerve conduction study