Skip to main content
Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation
Download PDF
  • Original article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Validity of high-resolution ultrasonographic measurement versus electrophysiological study in the detection of frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Egyptian Rheumatology and Rehabilitation volume 41, pages 122–129 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the frequency of occurrence of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, determine its relation to disease activity, describe the ultrasonographic (US) finding of CTS, and compare the diagnostic value of US with the electrodiagnosis in the detection of CTS.

Patients and methods

This study was carried out on 54 adult RA patients (group II) compared with 20 healthy volunteers as controls (group I). The disease activity in all patients was assessed using DAS28. All patients and controls underwent complete rheumatological and neurological examinations. Nerve conduction study (NCS) and high-resolution sonography were assessed in a blinded manner to clinical data. The patients were subdivided into two groups according to the measurement of NCS (group IIA: RA patients with CTS and group IIB: RA patients without CTS).

Results

The frequency of CTS in RA patients was 40.7%. A strong positive correlation was found between group IIA and the disease activity scale (P < 0.0001). There was a significantly higher level of cross-sectional area at the carpal tunnel inlet in group IIA than in group IIB and the control group (P < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between the mean cross-sectional area with the grades of CTS detected by the electrophysiological study. The area under the curve was large for all receiver operating characteristic curves for each measurement (0.800).

Conclusion

The frequency of CTS in RA patents is high. High-frequency US examination of the median nerve should be strongly considered as a new alternative diagnostic modality for the evaluation of CTS. Sonography is probably preferable because it is painless, fast, easily accessible, and preferred by the patients.

References

  1. Sivri A, Guler-Uysal F. The electroneurophysiological findings in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 1999; 39:387–391.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shinoda J, Hashizume H, McCown C, Senda M, Nishida K, Doi T, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome grading system in rheumatoid arthritis. J Orthop Sci 2002; 7:188–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Unal O, Ozcakar L, Cetin A, Kaymak B. Severe bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in juvenile chronic arthritis. Pediatr Neurol 2003; 29:345–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E. Diagnostic properties of nerve conduction tests in population-based carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lew HL, Date ES, Pan SS, Wu P, Ware PF, Kingery WS. Sensitivity, specificity, and variability of nerve conduction velocity measurements in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86:12–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beekman R, Visser LH. Sonography in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a critical review of the literature. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27:26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uchiyama S, Itsubo T, Yasutomi T, Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Kato H. Quantitative MRI of the wrist and nerve conduction studies in patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76:1103–1108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS, et al. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31:315–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts: Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38:44–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinals RS, Masi AT, Larsen RA. Preliminary criteria for clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1981; 24:1308–1315.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Levine DW, Simmons PB, Koris MJ, Daltroy LH, Hohl GG, Fossel AH, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75A:1585–1592.

  12. Wong SM, Griffith JF, Hui AC, Lo SK, Fu M, Wong KS. Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography. Radiology 2004; 232: 93–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Williams FH. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee. Muscle Nerve 1993; 16:1392–1414.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. DeLisa JA, Lee HJ, Baran EM, Lai KL, Spielholz, N. Manuel of nerve condition velocity and clinical neurophysiology. 3rd ed., New York: Raven Pres; 1994. 70–81.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Padua L, Padua R, LoMonaco M, Romanini E, Tonali P. Italian multicentre study of carpal tunnel syndrome: study design. Italian CTS Study Group. Ital J Neurol Sci 1998; 19:285–289.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Werner RA, Andary M. Carpal tunnel syndrome: pathophysiology and clinical neurophysiology. Clin Neurophysiol 2002; 113:1373–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Padua L, Lo Monaco M, Padua R, Gregori B, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification of carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment of 600 symptomatic hands. Ital J Neurol Sci 1997; 18:145–150.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. SPSS Inc. Statistical package for the social sciences for Windows, version 11. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lanzillo B, Pappone N, Crisci C, di Girolamo C, Massini R, Caruso G. Subclinical peripheral nerve involvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1998; 41:1196–1202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aluclu MU, Turhanoglu AD, Aluclu MA. The frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Internet J Neurol 2006; 5:543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bekkelund SI, Mellgren SI, Proven A, Husby G. Quantified neurological examination with emphasis on motor and sensory functions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and controls. Br J Rheumatol 1996; 35: 1116–1121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dumitru D. Focal peripheral neuropathies. In: Dumitru D, editor. Electrodiagnostic medicine. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1995. 851–927.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nadkar MY, Agarwal R, Samant RS, Chhugani SJ, Idgunji SS, Iyer S, et al. Neuropathy in rheumatoid arthritis. J Assoc Physicians India 2001; 49:217–220.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Klauser AS, Halpern EJ, De Zordo T, Feuchtner GM, Arora R, Gruber J, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with US: value of additional cross-sectional area measurements of the median nerve in patients versus healthy volunteers. Radiology 2009; 250:171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buchberger W, Judmaier W, Birbamer G, Lener M, Schmidauer C Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnosis with high-resolution sonography. Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:793–798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leonard L, Rangan A, Doyle G, Taylor G. Carpal tunnel syndrome –is high-frequency ultrasound a useful diagnostic tool? J Hand Surg Br 2003; 28:77–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ashraf AR, Jali R, Moghtaderi AR, Yazdani AH. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography in patients with electrophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 49:3–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lee D, Van Holsbeeck T, Janevski P, Ganos DL, Ditmars DM, Darian VB. Diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Radiol Clin North Am 1999; 37: 859–872.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Keberle M, Jenett M, Kenn W, Reiners K, Peter M, Haerten R, et al. Technical advances in ultrasound and MR imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1043–1050.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Keleş I, Karagülle Kendi AT, Aydin G, Zöğ SG, Orkun S. Diagnostic precision of ultrasonography in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84:443–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Radack DM, Schweitzer ME, Taras J. Carpal tunnel syndrome: are the MR findings a result of population selection bias? Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169:1649–1653.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarría L, Cabada T, Cozcolluela R, Martínez-Berganza T, García S. Carpal tunnel syndrome: usefulness of sonography. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:1920–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen P, Maklad N, Redwine M, Zelitt D. Dynamic high-resolution sonography of the carpal tunnel. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:533–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departments of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, El Minia University, Minia, Egypt

    Rawhya R. El-Shereef MD, Ahmad Lotfi & Fatma Ali

  2. Departments of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, El Minia University, Minia, Egypt

    Sammer F. El-Shayb

Authors
  1. Rawhya R. El-Shereef MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmad Lotfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatma Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sammer F. El-Shayb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rawhya R. El-Shereef MD.

Rights and permissions

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Shereef, R.R., Lotfi, A., Ali, F. et al. Validity of high-resolution ultrasonographic measurement versus electrophysiological study in the detection of frequency of carpal tunnel syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 41, 122–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.140528

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/1110-161X.140528

Keywords