Table 3 Comparison between the two groups according to somatosensory-evoked potential
From: Neurophysiological evaluation of juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus
Somatosensory-evoked potential | Studied children | Control group | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Post-tibial (P 40) | Latency (ms) | (n = 37) | (n = 30) | ||
Min. – Max | 29.60–47.80 | 30.0–37.0 | 2.409* | 0.019* | |
Mean ± SD | 36.82 ± 4.06 | 34.83 ± 2.21 | |||
Median | 36.60 | 33.79 | |||
Amplitude (µv) | (n = 37) | (n = 30) | |||
Min. – Max | 1.33 – 6.83 | 3.80 – 13.0 | 5.785* | < 0.001* | |
Mean ± SD | 3.77 ± 1.58 | 6.43 ± 2.18 | |||
Median | 3.75 | 6.0 | |||
Median (N20) | Latency (ms) | (n = 38) | (n = 30) | ||
Min. – Max | 14.40 – 22.20 | 15.50 – 19.0 | 1.415 | 0.162 | |
Mean ± SD | 17.29 ± 1.46 | 16.87 ± 0.80 | |||
Median | 17.0 | 17.0 | |||
Amplitude (µv) | (n = 38) | (n = 30) | |||
Min. – Max | 3.80 – 15.90 | 6.50 – 18.0 | 14.634* | < 0.001* | |
Mean ± SD | 9.14 ± 3.43 | 9.35 ± 3.46 | |||
Median | 8.88 | 3.56 |