Table 3 Comparison of the Modified Oxford Muscle Grading System before and after the intervention per rectum and per vaginal examination among the three studied groups
From: Pelvic floor rehabilitation in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence among women
MOS | Group I | Test of sig. | p | Group II | Test of sig. | p | Group III | Test of sig. | p | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | Before intervention | After intervention | |||||||||||||
n | % | n | % | (n) | % | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | |||||||
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |||||||||||
Per rectum | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | Z = − 2.8 | 0.004* | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | Z = − 2.97 | 0.003* | 1 | 4.3% | 0 | 0% | Z = − 3.36 | 0.001* |
2 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4.5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | ||||||
3 | 9 | 39.1% | 4 | 17.4% | 15 | 68.2% | 6 | 27.3% | 15 | 65.2% | 7 | 30.4% | ||||||
4 | 13 | 56.5% | 13 | 56.5% | 6 | 27.3% | 15 | 68.2% | 6 | 26.1% | 13 | 56.5% | ||||||
5 | 1 | 4.3% | 6 | 26.1% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4.5% | 1 | 4.3% | 3 | 13.0% | ||||||
Percentage of improvement 8.7% | 10.9% | 11.3% | ||||||||||||||||
Per vagina | ||||||||||||||||||
1 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | Z = − 3.2 | 0.001* | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | Z = − 3.16 | 0.002* | 1 | 4.3% | 0 | 0% | Z = − 3.36 | 0.001* |
2 | 3 | 13% | 1 | 4.3% | 1 | 4.5% | 1 | 4.5% | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0% | ||||||
3 | 13 | 56.5% | 6 | 26.1% | 15 | 68.2% | 6 | 27.3% | 18 | 78.3% | 8 | 34.8% | ||||||
4 | 7 | 30.4% | 12 | 52.2% | 6 | 27.3% | 14 | 63.6% | 4 | 17.4% | 12 | 52.2% | ||||||
5 | 0 | 0% | 4 | 14.4% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 4.5% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 13.0% | ||||||
Percentage of improvement 13% | 9% | 14% | ||||||||||||||||