Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of different nerve conduction study parameters between the three patients’ groups and the control group

From: Association between carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger: a clinical and electrophysiological study

Nerve conduction study parameters

CTS group

(n = 57 hands from 36 patients) b, mean ± SD

TF group

(n = 25 hands from 22 patients), mean ± SD

CTS with TF group

(n = 28 hands from 24 patients) b, mean ± SD

Control group

(n = 60 hands from 46 apparently healthy volunteers), mean ± SD

Test of significance

P

  Median SNAP CV (m/s)

43.37 ± 7.21 c, d

54.44 ± 4.28

44.84 ± 9.74 c, g

54.80 ± 4.77 d, g

(K) 62.904

≤ 0.0001*

  Median SNAP amp (μV)

19.87 ± 11.18 c, e

28.66 ± 17.55

20.44 ± 8.60 c, h

29.43 ± 10.81 e h

(K) 22.003

≤ 0.0001*

  Ulnar SNAP CV (m/s)

54.60 ± 5.08

56.98 ± 4.44

54.97 ± 4.07

55.34 ± 4.62

(K) 4.997

0.172

  Ulnar SNAP amp (μV)

24.23 ± 11.27

30.04 ± 13.22

22.81 ± 9.29

25.55 ± 7.43

(K) 4.240

0.237

  Median DL (ms)

4.52 ± 1.09 c, f

3.50 ± 0.35

4.24 ± 0.87 c, i

3.45 ± 0.38 f, i

(K) 62.318

≤ 0.0001*

  Median CMAP amp (mV)

9.22 ± 3.03

10.12 ± 3.67

10.29 ± 4.13

9.80 ± 3.21

(K) 2.042

0.564

  Ulnar DL (ms)

3.01 ± 0.35

2.96 ± 0.37

3.00 ± 0.36

3.02 ± 0.31

(K) 0.887

0.828

  Ulnar CMAP amp (mV)

8.45 ± 2.61

9.45 ± 3.33

9.10 ± 2.76

8.23 ± 2.19

(K) 3.613

0.306

Padua neurophysiological classification scale

      

  Class 1 (negative CTS) a

9 (15.8)

NA

8 (28.6)

NA

(X2) 3.956

0.556

  Class 2 (minimal CTS) a

5 (8.8)

NA

3 (10.7)

NA

  

  Class 3 (mild CTS) a

20 (35.1)

NA

7 (25.0)

NA

  

  Class 4 (moderate CTS) a

19 (33.3)

NA

9 (32.1)

NA

  

  Class 5 (severe CTS) a

3 (5.3)

NA

0 (0)

NA

  

  Class 6 (extreme CTS) a

1 (1.8)

NA

1 (3.6)

NA

  
  1. SNAP, sensory nerve action potential; CV, conduction velocity; m, meter; s, second; amp, amplitude; μV, microvolt; DL, distal latency; CMAP, compound muscle action potentials; mV, millivolt; CTS, carpal tunnel syndrome; n, number of hands; SD, standard deviation; TF, trigger finger; NA, not applicable; K, value of Kruskal–Wallis test; X2, value of Pearson’s chi-squared test.
  2. *P is significant at < 0.05.
  3. aData are presented as number (percentage) of hands.
  4. bThere were seven patients with bilateral CTS in which there was TF in one hand and not in the other. These seven patients were presented in the CTS group regarding their hands with only CTS and presented again in the CTS with TF group regarding their hands with CTS and TF.
  5. cNo significant difference between the CTS group and the CTS with TF group (P > 0,05).
  6. dMedian SNAP CV was significantly slower in the CTS group versus the control group (P ≤ 0.0001).
  7. eMedian SNAP amplitude was significantly reduced in the CTS group versus the control group (P ≤ 0.0001).
  8. fMedian DL was significantly delayed in the CTS group versus the control group (P ≤ 0.0001).
  9. gMedian SNAP CV was significantly slower in the CTS with TF group versus the control group (P ≤ 0.0001).
  10. hMedian SNAP amplitude was significantly reduced in the CTS with TF group versus the control group (P ≤ 0.0001).
  11. iMedian DL was significantly delayed in the CTS with TF group versus the control group (P ≤ 0.0001).